AMCH Student Login Status

You are not currently logged in.

» Lost your Password?

How Does Homeopathy Work

Homeopathic MedicineHow does homeopathy work? Homeopathy is an over 200-year-old system of complementary and alternative medicine developed by the German physician-chemist Samuel Hahnemann. Hahnemann developed homeopathy as a way of doing no harm to his patients with a natural therapy that could stimulate innate healing in the body from acute or chronic conditions.

The controversies around homeopathy stem mainly from the way in which the medicines (also called remedies) are made from natural animal, mineral, and plant sources. The manufacturing process involves trituration (a manual method of grinding insoluble materials) in milk sugar (lactose) and then performing a process of serial dilutions. Some of the earliest preparation steps use dry dilutions in lactose with additional trituration (grinding or milling) steps.

Milling is a well-known method for breaking down bulk materials, including drugs, into smaller and smaller particles until they reach nanosize (1,2).

The ratios with which the dilutions are done are typically 1/10 (X series), 1/100 (C series), or 1/50,000 (LM or Q series).

At some point in the lower potency range, the serial dilution process is shifted to a liquid method in which a mixture of ethanol (alcohol) and water is used.  After each dilution step, the mixture is agitated vigorously by pounding the container (typically made of glass) against a hard elastic surface multiple times. The agitation steps are called succussions, which create intense shear forces in the solution and particle collisions as well as nanobubbles. In modern nanotechnology, this type of intense agitation involves vortexing or sonication. It creates and embeds nanoparticles into glass or polymer surfaces in contact with the solution (3).

Homeopathic Medicines are Nanostructures

Recent scientific studies have demonstrated that the manufacturing process creates nanoparticles of the original source material (4-10) and that the physical chemistry of the preparation method forces the nanoparticles to accumulate in a non-uniform way toward the top of the container after each dilution step (7). Nanoparticles can also adsorb (attach) to the walls of their container (3,11). Then the next “dilution” step ends up transferring nanoparticles from the previous step into the next container (7).

That is, although skeptics have long attacked homeopathy because of the molecular limits of Avogadro’s number and the presumption that homeopathic medicines are too “dilute” to contain any active material, the scientific evidence is that homeopathic remedies are nanoparticles, not ordinary conventional bulk forms of source material. That fact changes the scientific issues completely from a debate over “placebo effects” to a serious scientific consideration of how nanoparticles can act in the body to stimulate healing processes (12,13).

In addition, succussions have repeatedly been shown in multiple research laboratories to release silica and silica precursors from the walls of the glass in which the succussions are performed (14,15). Plant extracts can make unique nanoparticles from silica precursors into plant-coated silica nanoparticles (16), or metal nanoparticles from metal precursors into plant-coated metal nanoparticles (17).

The silicates themselves can form specific nanostructures using templates in solution with it (18). Silica crystals and nanoparticles themselves are very active biologically and can amplify the effects of other substances or antigens with which they are administered (19). They form the basis of an emerging method of making more effective vaccines for oral delivery using less antigen (19,20). Silica can also imprint the structural information of other materials in solution with it, as it can self-assemble around templates such as plant constituents, proteins, DNA, cells, and viruses (18, 21). One recent study has documented silica coatings around the source material nanoparticles in homeopathic medicines (44).

Properties of Nanoparticles

Nanoparticles are very small forms of material, measuring 1-1000 nanometers in diameter along at least one side. The most interesting sizes of nanoparticles recognized by official research organizations are actually between 1-100 nanometers (22). Some homeopathic nanoparticles tend to be on the very small size range, perhaps around 15 nanometers or less (4,6). At small nanometer scale, because of the high surface area to volume ratio, nanoparticles acquire properties that the larger, bulk form of the “same” material do not possess.

These nanoparticle properties include the ability to adsorb other materials onto their surfaces (18), cross cell membranes without difficulty to enter cells, and act as highly catalytic and reactive agents in biological systems. Nanoparticles have biological, chemical, optical, thermal, electromagnetic, and quantum mechanical properties that larger particles do not (22). Nanomedicine forms have increased bioavailability, require lower doses to get the same effect, can have longer durations of action, and fewer side effects compared with ordinary conventional drugs, herbs, or vaccines (19,22). At least two published studies documented the presence of the smallest size nanoparticles of source material, called quantum dots (<10 nanometers), in homeopathically-prepared medicines (4,45). This finding potentially links to a number of different anomalous findings with homeopathy that suggest the occurrence of quantum entanglement and/or quantum coherence domains (29,30). In physical chemistry, solvatochromic dyes can detect the presence of the source material homeopathic information in solution (46).

Nanoparticles can initiate hormesis and adaptive changes in cells and organisms

Nanoparticles not only need lower doses to produce their direct effects on biological systems, but some nanoparticles can also initiate a counter-action response, i.e., adaptive process, in the cell or organism known as hormesis (23). Hormesis is the ability of low doses to stimulate beneficial changes whereas higher doses of the same material can inhibit function or cause adverse effects. Hormesis depends upon the dynamical state of the recipient complex adaptive system at the time it encounters the treatment stimulus/stressor/agent.

Conventional drugs typically work in a higher dose range trying to just barely avoid toxicity (or not) and causing “side effects” while suppressing or inhibiting function to act at local tissues or cell receptors. Hormetic stimuli appear to act more as triggers for adaptive processes within the overall cell or whole organism to prepare for a future onslaught from a higher, more dangerous dose of the same or similar environmental threat (23,24). Some hormetic effects can be broader and more holistic in their scope than those of drugs. The result in hormesis is increased ability of the cell or organism to cope better, faster, and more effectively with future stressors or threats to survival as soon as they arise.

Another key question is the nature of the signal or information that the correct homeopathic medicine conveys to the recipient living organism or cell as a complex adaptive system. Salience is essential; if the medicine is poorly matched to the individual symptom picture, no effect occurs. The data are converging on several different “signals” or information types:  (i) electromagnetic (25-26); (ii) optical or photon (light)-based (27-28); (iii) quantum mechanical entanglement and quantum coherence (29-30). These are all types of signals or information that various forms of nanoparticles can generate (31). Of note, placebo-controlled empirical evidence indicates that people can just sniff individually salient homeopathic medicine and show changes in brain wave (EEG) responses (32-33). Olfaction is one sensory system that may engage quantum biology processes in detecting specific information from environmental agents/odorants (34-35), even at levels hard to detect consciously.

Although skeptics choose to ignore all of the basic science, animal studies, and the positive clinical studies, the scientific evidence indicates that homeopathic medicines do exert measurable effects on living systems. Homeopathy was considered safe and likely effective in a comprehensive scientific review commissioned by the Swiss government (36).

Some studies are negative, a finding that is common to all types of clinical treatments including mainstream treatments. As with all systems of treatment, some placebo effects can also occur. Research has shown that the placebo effect size in controlled studies of homeopathic medicine is on average not unusually large or small – that is, the placebo effect size is what is expected for any therapeutic intervention (37).


Homeopathic medicine is one of the first systems of personalized medicine in which the individual’s complete pattern of health problems leads to a precisely-targeted treatment choice. Homeopathic manufacturing is a crude form of “top-down” mechanical attrition methods for making nanoparticles. The fields of modern nanoscience and nanomedicines are relatively new, but it appears that Hahnemann was among the first to discover how to make nanoparticles from natural products and use them for medicinal purposes via hormetic dose levels (38). Conversely, modern nanoscientists are beginning to explore how extremely low concentrations of nanoparticles can still exert profound chemical catalytic effects as well as toxicity, even in the parts per billion range (39-40). That means that the cut-off for beneficial effects from low doses, i.e., hormesis, is even lower (13,41). Once set into motion, the organism or cell as a complex adaptive system, carries out a cascade of interrelated nonlinear dynamical changes in biology across the network organization of the body or cell (42,43). One biological starting point is the replicated finding of modulation of gene expression patterns by homeopathic medicines (47-49), as well as modulation of immune system mediator activation patterns (50-52).


1. DeCastro CL, Mitchell BS. Nanoparticles from mechanical attrition. In: Baraton MI, ed. Synthesis, Functionalization, and Surface Treatment of Nanoparticles. Valencia, CA: American Scientific Publisher; 2002:1-15.

2. Merisko-Liversidge E, Liversidge GG. Nanosizing for oral and parenteral drug delivery: a perspective on formulating poorly-water soluble compounds using wet media milling technology. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. May 30 2011;63(6):427-440.

3. Kiel S, Grinberg O, Perkas N, Charmet J, Kepner H, Gedanken A. Forming nanoparticles of water-soluble ionic molecules and embedding them into polymer and glass substrates. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2012;3:267-276

4. Chikramane PS et al. Extreme homeopathic dilutions retain starting materials: a nanoparticulate perspective. Homeopathy 2010; 99(4):231-42.

5. Upadhyay RP and Nayak C. Homeopathy emerging as nanomedicine. International Journal of High Dilution Research 2011; 10(37):299-310.

6. Barve R and Chaughule R. Size-dependent in vivo/in vitro results of homeopathic herbal extracts. J Nanostructure in Chemistry 2013; 3:18.

7. Chikramane PS et al. Why extreme dilutions reach non-zero asymptotes: a nanoparticulate hypothesis based on froth flotation. Langmuir (American Chemical Society) 2012; 28(45):15864-75.

8. Elia V, Ausanio G, Gentile F, et al. Experimental evidence of stable water nanostructures in extremely dilute solutions, at standard pressure and temperature. Homeopathy. 2014;103:44-50.

9. Demangeat JL. NMR relaxation evidence for solute-induced nanosized superstructures in ultramolecular aqueous dilutions of silica-lactose. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2010;155:71-9

10. Konovalov AI,Ryzhkina IS. Highly diluted aqueous solutions: formation of nano-sized molecular assemblies (nanoassociates). Geochem. Int. 2014;52:1207-26.

11. Snitka V, Naumenko DO, Ramanauskaite L, Kravchenko SA, Snopok BA. Generation of diversiform gold nanostructures inspired by honey’s components: Growth mechanism, characterization, and shape separation by the centrifugation-assisted sedimentation. J Colloid Interface Sci. Jul 20 2012;386(1):99-106.

12. Bell IR and Koithan M. A model for homeopathic remedy effects: low dose nanoparticles, allostatic cross-adaptation, and time-dependent sensitization in a complex adaptive system. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012; 12(1):191 (epub) Get pdf download here

13. Bell IR, Schwartz GE. Adaptive network nanomedicine: an integrated model for homeopathic medicine. Frontiers in Bioscience (Scholar Edition) 2013; 5(2):685-708.

14. Ives JA et al. Enzyme stabilization by glass-derived silicates in glass-exposed aqueous solutions. Homeopathy 2010; 99(1):15-24.

15.Demangeat JL. Nanosized solvent superstructures in ultramolecular aqueous dilutions: twenty years’ research using water proton NMR relaxation. Homeopathy. 2013;102:87-105.

16. Perry CC, Keeling-Tucker T. Crystalline silica prepared at room temperature from aqueous solution in the presence of intrasilica bioextracts. Chem Commun (Camb). 1998;1998(23):2587-2588.

17. Das S et al. Biosynthesized silver nanoparticles by ethanolic extracts of Phytolacca decandra, Gelsemium sempervirens, Hydrastis canadensis and Thuja occidentalis induce differential cytotoxicity through G2/M arrest in A375 cells. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 2013; 101:325-335.

18. Zhai C, Lu Q, Chen X, Peng Y, Chen L, Du S. Molecularly imprinted layer-coated silica nanoparticles toward highly selective separation of active diosgenin from Dioscorea nipponica Makino. J Chromatogr A. Mar 20 2009;1216(12):2254-2262.

19. Wang T, Jiang H, Zhao Q, Wang S, Zou M, Cheng G. Enhanced mucosal and systemic immune responses obtained by porous silica nanoparticles used as an oral vaccine adjuvant: Effect of silica architecture on immunological properties. Int J Pharm. Jun 18 2012;436(1-2):351-358.

20. Mahony D, Cavallaro AS, Stahr F, Mahony TJ, Qiao SZ, Mitter N. Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Act as a Self-Adjuvant for Ovalbumin Model Antigen in Mice. Small. Apr 26 2013;9(18):3138-3146.

21. Cumbo A, Lorber B, Corvini PF, Meier W, Shahgaldian P. A synthetic nanomaterial for virus recognition produced by surface imprinting. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1503.

22. Armstead AL, Li B. Nanomedicine as an emerging approach against intracellular pathogens. Int J Nanomedicine. 2011;6:3281-3293.

23. Iavicoli I, Calabrese EJ, Nascarella MA. Exposure to nanoparticles and hormesis. Dose Response. 2010;8(4):501-517.

24. Bell IR, Sarter B, Koithan M, Standish LJ, Banerji P, Banerji P. Nonlinear response amplification mechanisms for low doses of natural product nanomedicines: dynamical interactions with the recipient complex adaptive system. J Nanomed Nanotechnol 2013; 4(4):179.

25. Belon P, Elia V, Elia L, et al. Conductometric and calorimetric studies of the serially diluted and agitated solutions. Journal of Thermal Analysis & Calorimetry. 2008;93:459-69.

26. Montagnier L, Aissa J, Ferris S, et al. Electromagnetic signals are produced by aqueous nanostructures derived from bacterial DNA sequences. Interdisciplinary Sci Comput Life Sci. 2009;1:81-90.

27. Lenger K, Bajpai RP,Spielmann M. Identification of Unknown Homeopathic Remedies by Delayed Luminescence. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2013;68:321-34.

28. Rey L. Thermoluminescence of ultra-high dilutions of lithium chloride and sodium chloride. Physica A: Statistical mechanics and its applications. 2003;323:67-74.

29. Walach H. Entanglement model of homeopathy as an example of generalised entanglement predicted by weak quantum theory. Forschende Komplementarmedizin/Research in Complementary Medicine. 2003;10:192-200.

30. Hyland ME. Extended network generalized entanglement theory: therapeutic mechanisms, empirical predictions, and investigations. J Altern Complement Med 2003; 9(6):919-936.

31. Roduner E. Size matters: why nanomaterials are different. Chemical Society Reviews. 2006;35:583-92.

32. Bell IR, Brooks AJ, Howerter A, et al. Acute electroencephalographic effects from repeated olfactory administration of homeopathic remedies in individuals with self-reported chemical sensitivity. Alternative Therapies in Health & Medicine. 2013;19:46-57.

33. Bell IR, Lewis DA, 2nd, Lewis SE, et al. EEG alpha sensitization in individualized homeopathic treatment of fibromyalgia. International Journal of Neuroscience. 2004;114:1195-220.

34. Arndt, M, Juffmann, T, Vedral, V. Quantum physics meets biology. HFSP Journal 2009; 3(6):386-400.

35. Lambert N, Chen, Y-N, Cheng, Y-C, et al. Quantum biology. Nature Physics 2013; 9:10-18.

36. Bornhoft G, Matthiessen PF. Homeopathy in Healthcare — Effectiveness, Appropriateness, Safety, Costs. Springer; 2011.

37. Nuhn T, Ludtke R, Geraedts M. Placebo effect sizes in homeopathic compared to conventional drugs – a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Homeopathy 2010; 99(1):76-82.

38. Hahnemann S. Organon of the Medical Art.  6th ed. Redmond, WA: Birdcage Books; 1843.

39. Deraedt C, Astruc D. “Homeopathic” palladium nanoparticle catalysis of cross carbon-carbon coupling reactions. Acc Chem Res 2013 (November); ePub DOI 10.1021/ar400168s.

40. Bar-Ilan, O, et al. TiO2 nanoparticle exposure and illumination during zebrafish development: mortality at parts per billion concentrations. Environ Sci Technol 2013; 47(9):4726-33.

41. Van Wijk R., Wiegant F.A. Postconditioning hormesis and the homeopathic Similia principle: molecular aspects. Hum Exp Toxicol 2010; 29(7):561-5.

42. Pincus, D., Metten, A. Nonlinear dynamics in biopsychosocial resilience. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci 2010; 14(4):353-80.

43. Mihalik A., Csermely, P. Heat shock partially dissociates the overlapping modules of the yeast protein-protein interaction network: a systems level model of adaptation. PLOS Comput Biol 2011; 7(10):e1002187.

44. Temgire MK, Suresh AK, Kane SG, Bellare JR. Establishing the interfacial nano-structure and elemental composition of homeopathic medicines based on inorganic salts: a scientific approach. Homeopathy 2016; published online.

45. Rajendran ES. An evaluation of Avogadro’s number in the light of HRTEM and EDS studies of high dilutions of Ferrum metallicum 6, 30, 200, 1M, 10M, and 50M. International Journal of High Dilutiion Research 2015; 14(3):3-9.

46. Cartwright SJ. Solvatochromic dyes detect the presence of homeopathic potencies. Homeopathy 2016; 105(1):55-65.

47. Marzotto M, Olioso D, Brizzi M, Tononi P, Crostofoletti M, Bellavite P. Extreme sensitivity of gene expression in human SH-SY5Y neurocytes to ultra-low doses of Gelsemium sempervirens. BMC Complement Altern Med 2014; 14:104.

48. Frenkel M, Mishra BM, Sen S, et al. Cytotoxic effects of ultra-diluted remedies on breast cancer cells. Int J Oncol 2010; 36(2):395-403.

49. Dei A, Bernardini S. Hormetic effects of extremely diluted solutions on gene expression. Homeopathy 2015; 104(2):116-122.

50. Smit E, Oberholzer HM, Pretorius E. A review of immunomodulators with reference to Canova. Homeopathy 2009; 98(3):169-76.

51. Remya V, Kuttan G. Homeopathic remedies with antineoplastic properties have immunomodulatory effects in experimental animals. Homeopathy 2015; 104(3):211-219.

52. Saha S, Hossain DM, Mukherjee S, et al. Calcarea carbonica induces apoptosis in cancer cells in p53-dependent manner via an immuno-modulatory circuit. BMC Complementary Altern Med 13(1):230.